4 From Noise to Persona: How I Learned to Actually Listen to Customers Copy Copy Copy



When you're drowning in customer input - Reddit threads, Slack messages, sales calls, support tickets - it's easy to think you're doing solid customer development. But here's the truth: raw feedback doesn't build clarity. In my case, it almost killed it.
This post is about how I went from a wall of conflicting opinions to a working persona that finally made our roadmap click. If you're testing a new feature or trying to get traction with
When “We Know Our User” Starts Falling Apart
It’s 1 a.m. I’m staring at my Notion board - a mess of Reddit screenshots, Slack messages, and support ticket quotes. Everything looks important, but none of it fits together. A prospect just ghosted after a demo, and the “persona” I built can’t explain why.
One person says the pricing’s too high. Another says it’s perfect. One designer loves our UI. A developer calls it “straight outta 1998.” It’s a mess of contradictions. And I realize: I haven’t built a persona. I’ve built noise.
That night, I promised myself I’d figure it out - not just who our user is, but what they actually care about. Here's how I got there, and the costly mistake I almost made.
Step One: Filter Signals from Echoes
The next morning, I opened a blank spreadsheet and asked myself three questions:
What’s this person trying to do?
What’s getting in their way?
Why does this matter to them right now?
If a comment didn’t answer at least one of those, it went in the archive. Out of a hundred notes, only 17 made the cut.
That’s when things started making sense. I ran those notes through Zaqlick. Its AI personas grouped the quotes not by buzzwords but by intent. That stopped me from chasing viral phrasing that sounded smart but led nowhere.
Patterns started to show. Solo founders talked about “runway panic.” Funded teams mentioned “board pressure.” Same complaints on the surface, but completely different stakes underneath.
Step Two: Map Pains, Gains, and Triggers
I printed the shortlist, spread the quotes out, and started mapping: pains on the left, goals on the right, triggers in the middle. And suddenly, the real mistake hit me: I’d been confusing words with meaning.
Two people both said “deployment sucks.” One meant tedious manual testing. The other was talking about vendor lock-in. Same words. Totally different problems.
Then I noticed something else: people complaining about “deployment” often mentioned “Friday nights.” Their pain wasn’t technical. It was emotional. They were tired of spending their weekends fixing stuff. That tiny detail changed how we talked about our product completely.
Step Three: Put the Persona to the Test
A persona on a slide deck is still just a guess. So I ran a quick A/B test: one landing page used our old, safe copy. The other used the new messaging rooted in emotional fatigue. Within 24 hours, the second version had double the click-through rate.
Next, I booked three user calls based on the new persona. Zaqlick helped me generate a focused interview script in minutes. And it worked: call times dropped from 42 minutes to 18. No more circling vague pain points - we hit the core issues right away.
A week later, our demo-to-trial conversion jumped from 8% to 27%. The persona wasn’t perfect. But it actually predicted behavior - and that’s the only test that matters.
What I Got Wrong
Looking back, my big mistake was assuming “most mentioned” meant “most important.” It doesn’t. Just because something’s loud doesn’t mean it matters.
A rare, specific pain point - if it’s real - can teach you more than 50 surface-level takes. I almost missed that by chasing volume instead of value.
What Finally Clicked
Remember that Notion board? Now it’s just one clean column labeled “exhausted founder.” Every quote lines up. Every message hits. Calls don’t feel like a guessing game anymore. They feel like we’re picking up a conversation that already started.
And yeah - I sleep at night again.
Takeaway
Noise is free. Insight takes work.
If you’re sitting on a pile of raw feedback, don’t ignore it - but don’t worship it either. Take the time to sharpen it into something useful. That’s what turns conversations into clarity.
When you're drowning in customer input - Reddit threads, Slack messages, sales calls, support tickets - it's easy to think you're doing solid customer development. But here's the truth: raw feedback doesn't build clarity. In my case, it almost killed it.
This post is about how I went from a wall of conflicting opinions to a working persona that finally made our roadmap click. If you're testing a new feature or trying to get traction with
When “We Know Our User” Starts Falling Apart
It’s 1 a.m. I’m staring at my Notion board - a mess of Reddit screenshots, Slack messages, and support ticket quotes. Everything looks important, but none of it fits together. A prospect just ghosted after a demo, and the “persona” I built can’t explain why.
One person says the pricing’s too high. Another says it’s perfect. One designer loves our UI. A developer calls it “straight outta 1998.” It’s a mess of contradictions. And I realize: I haven’t built a persona. I’ve built noise.
That night, I promised myself I’d figure it out - not just who our user is, but what they actually care about. Here's how I got there, and the costly mistake I almost made.
Step One: Filter Signals from Echoes
The next morning, I opened a blank spreadsheet and asked myself three questions:
What’s this person trying to do?
What’s getting in their way?
Why does this matter to them right now?
If a comment didn’t answer at least one of those, it went in the archive. Out of a hundred notes, only 17 made the cut.
That’s when things started making sense. I ran those notes through Zaqlick. Its AI personas grouped the quotes not by buzzwords but by intent. That stopped me from chasing viral phrasing that sounded smart but led nowhere.
Patterns started to show. Solo founders talked about “runway panic.” Funded teams mentioned “board pressure.” Same complaints on the surface, but completely different stakes underneath.
Step Two: Map Pains, Gains, and Triggers
I printed the shortlist, spread the quotes out, and started mapping: pains on the left, goals on the right, triggers in the middle. And suddenly, the real mistake hit me: I’d been confusing words with meaning.
Two people both said “deployment sucks.” One meant tedious manual testing. The other was talking about vendor lock-in. Same words. Totally different problems.
Then I noticed something else: people complaining about “deployment” often mentioned “Friday nights.” Their pain wasn’t technical. It was emotional. They were tired of spending their weekends fixing stuff. That tiny detail changed how we talked about our product completely.
Step Three: Put the Persona to the Test
A persona on a slide deck is still just a guess. So I ran a quick A/B test: one landing page used our old, safe copy. The other used the new messaging rooted in emotional fatigue. Within 24 hours, the second version had double the click-through rate.
Next, I booked three user calls based on the new persona. Zaqlick helped me generate a focused interview script in minutes. And it worked: call times dropped from 42 minutes to 18. No more circling vague pain points - we hit the core issues right away.
A week later, our demo-to-trial conversion jumped from 8% to 27%. The persona wasn’t perfect. But it actually predicted behavior - and that’s the only test that matters.
What I Got Wrong
Looking back, my big mistake was assuming “most mentioned” meant “most important.” It doesn’t. Just because something’s loud doesn’t mean it matters.
A rare, specific pain point - if it’s real - can teach you more than 50 surface-level takes. I almost missed that by chasing volume instead of value.
What Finally Clicked
Remember that Notion board? Now it’s just one clean column labeled “exhausted founder.” Every quote lines up. Every message hits. Calls don’t feel like a guessing game anymore. They feel like we’re picking up a conversation that already started.
And yeah - I sleep at night again.
Takeaway
Noise is free. Insight takes work.
If you’re sitting on a pile of raw feedback, don’t ignore it - but don’t worship it either. Take the time to sharpen it into something useful. That’s what turns conversations into clarity.
When you're drowning in customer input - Reddit threads, Slack messages, sales calls, support tickets - it's easy to think you're doing solid customer development. But here's the truth: raw feedback doesn't build clarity. In my case, it almost killed it.
This post is about how I went from a wall of conflicting opinions to a working persona that finally made our roadmap click. If you're testing a new feature or trying to get traction with
When “We Know Our User” Starts Falling Apart
It’s 1 a.m. I’m staring at my Notion board - a mess of Reddit screenshots, Slack messages, and support ticket quotes. Everything looks important, but none of it fits together. A prospect just ghosted after a demo, and the “persona” I built can’t explain why.
One person says the pricing’s too high. Another says it’s perfect. One designer loves our UI. A developer calls it “straight outta 1998.” It’s a mess of contradictions. And I realize: I haven’t built a persona. I’ve built noise.
That night, I promised myself I’d figure it out - not just who our user is, but what they actually care about. Here's how I got there, and the costly mistake I almost made.
Step One: Filter Signals from Echoes
The next morning, I opened a blank spreadsheet and asked myself three questions:
What’s this person trying to do?
What’s getting in their way?
Why does this matter to them right now?
If a comment didn’t answer at least one of those, it went in the archive. Out of a hundred notes, only 17 made the cut.
That’s when things started making sense. I ran those notes through Zaqlick. Its AI personas grouped the quotes not by buzzwords but by intent. That stopped me from chasing viral phrasing that sounded smart but led nowhere.
Patterns started to show. Solo founders talked about “runway panic.” Funded teams mentioned “board pressure.” Same complaints on the surface, but completely different stakes underneath.
Step Two: Map Pains, Gains, and Triggers
I printed the shortlist, spread the quotes out, and started mapping: pains on the left, goals on the right, triggers in the middle. And suddenly, the real mistake hit me: I’d been confusing words with meaning.
Two people both said “deployment sucks.” One meant tedious manual testing. The other was talking about vendor lock-in. Same words. Totally different problems.
Then I noticed something else: people complaining about “deployment” often mentioned “Friday nights.” Their pain wasn’t technical. It was emotional. They were tired of spending their weekends fixing stuff. That tiny detail changed how we talked about our product completely.
Step Three: Put the Persona to the Test
A persona on a slide deck is still just a guess. So I ran a quick A/B test: one landing page used our old, safe copy. The other used the new messaging rooted in emotional fatigue. Within 24 hours, the second version had double the click-through rate.
Next, I booked three user calls based on the new persona. Zaqlick helped me generate a focused interview script in minutes. And it worked: call times dropped from 42 minutes to 18. No more circling vague pain points - we hit the core issues right away.
A week later, our demo-to-trial conversion jumped from 8% to 27%. The persona wasn’t perfect. But it actually predicted behavior - and that’s the only test that matters.
What I Got Wrong
Looking back, my big mistake was assuming “most mentioned” meant “most important.” It doesn’t. Just because something’s loud doesn’t mean it matters.
A rare, specific pain point - if it’s real - can teach you more than 50 surface-level takes. I almost missed that by chasing volume instead of value.
What Finally Clicked
Remember that Notion board? Now it’s just one clean column labeled “exhausted founder.” Every quote lines up. Every message hits. Calls don’t feel like a guessing game anymore. They feel like we’re picking up a conversation that already started.
And yeah - I sleep at night again.
Takeaway
Noise is free. Insight takes work.
If you’re sitting on a pile of raw feedback, don’t ignore it - but don’t worship it either. Take the time to sharpen it into something useful. That’s what turns conversations into clarity.
Type something ...
Search